NASA Fakes Moon Landings!
|
|
 |
 |
| Heroic images or NASA fraud? At last we
have the conclusive proof! The image on the left clearly shows the
supposed 25,000 of thrust generated by the lunar lander to arrest
its descent. Yet in the image on the right, where is the giant crater
this would have created? Looks like the complex web of NASA lies is
about to unravel! |
 |
Another apparently inspirational image
from the NASA archive. All seems fine at first but notice the numerous
directions in which the shadows are falling (marked with arrows).
This indicates that the image is probably composed of several images
taken at different times (probably in a top secret studio guarded
by specially trained aliens working as government agents) and joined
together using advanced technology NASA always denies existed at the
time.
This is the photographic equivalent of an automotive "cut-and-shut"
job. If this image were your car, you wouldn't trust it to take you
to the end of your road without breaking in half! |
 |
Not much wrong with this picture you may
think. Yet, by thinking that, you would just become yet another of
NASA's conspiracy victims.
Firstly, despite the absence of an atmosphere, no stars can be seen
in the sky.
Secondly, the interior of the shopping basket can clearly be seen
when all areas in shadow should be pitch black due to the absence
of air molecules.
Nice try NASA but we are not fooled that easily! |
 |
Just way too many things wrong with this
picture!
Notice the absence of stars again.
The arrows indicate the various directions in which shadows are falling,
again showing evidence of inconsistent scene illumination. Yet there
is something even more obviously wrong with this picture.
If the length of the lower support column of the lunar lander was
4 feet tall, this would indicate that the astronaut was over 8 feet
tall, which none of the astronauts were.
Another careless mistake from NASA. |
 |
Oh yes NASA, it's all very well adding
stars on this picture just to make us realise how wrong we have been.
We are not fooled so easily!
If we look a bit more closely, we spot the constellation of Pegasus
with the planet Saturn (marked S1) clearly visible in the top left
corner. Yet at the time of the mission, although Saturn appeared to
be near Pegasus from Earth, from the Moon it would have appeared
to be in a completely different position (marked S2).
It is almost insulting to think that NASA could get away with this
obvious howler! |
 |
Well, with this image where does one begin?!
Inconsistent shadows, too much ambient light and incorrect planetary
positioning in the sky are all evident here.
Also notice how the focal length of the camera lens has changed compared
to the pictures above, even though the astronauts' Hasselblad cameras
were only fitted with a single type of prime lens.
Just how stupid did the NASA officials think the public were? |